Search for: "Briggs v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2019, 3:57 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
Briggs, 19-108Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:14 pm by Keahn Morris and John Bolesta
Beginning in 2011, OUR Walmart’s stated goal was to improve the working conditions of all Walmart employees. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
  The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:22 am by The Editor , CMS
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Ella Wells, a trainee patent attorney at CMS, comment on the decision which is awaited in the matter of Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors. [read post]
In this respect, Lord Briggs commended the summary by Sales LJ in AAA v Unilever plc [2018] EWCA Civ 1532, para 36 (another challenge to jurisdiction on similar issues) that “A parent company will only be found to be subject to a duty of care in relation to an activity of its subsidiary if ordinary, general principles of the law of tort regarding the imposition of a duty of care on the part of the parent in favour of a claim are satisfied in the particular case”. [read post]