Search for: "Bright, R. v. Bright, W." Results 101 - 120 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
“[W]e do not perceive a bright line rule that restrictive covenants are unenforceable restraints on trade if imposed selectively and as a second layer,” the court said. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
A trade mark registration is prima facie evidence that the mark is registered and valid (Lane Capital Mgmt v Lane Capital Mgmt (1999)). [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am by Orin S. Kerr
One of the fascinating questions raised by the United States Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This might explain some of what the Supreme Court said and did in the 1993 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Lani Guinier noted two decades ago, from survey and academic performance data, that women, then a minority of law students, found law school a source of “alienat[ion]” and “distress”—and performed worse in law school despite credentials on par with those of men: [W]e find strong academic differences between graduating men and women. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
[W]e cannot say that the Framers used the word ‘try’ as an implied limitation on the method by which the Senate might proceed in trying impeachments. [read post]