Search for: "Brinker v. Brinker"
Results 101 - 120
of 622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
In Jones v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:27 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
The 90-minute webinar clears up any confusion and brings you up to date since the Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Williams v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
On Wednesday, March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court denied review in Jones v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
This is one of the twelve post-Brinker class certification decisions. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:40 am
Denying reconsideration, the court concluded that the Benton case did not change or extend the rule enunciated by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Yet we know from Brinker that the questioning does not always portend what we might expect. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
(Duran is not on the list above because it preceded Brinker.) [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:27 am
Jones v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
See Duran v. [read post]
Court of Appeal delivers stunnig rebuke of misclassification certification opinions based on Brinker
27 Jan 2014, 10:37 am
(See Heyen v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
(Brinker, supra, 53 Cal.4th at p. 1022, 139 Cal.Rptr.3d 315, 273 P.3d 513; Sav–On Drug Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
” (Brinker, supra, 53 Cal.4th at p. 1033.) [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:29 pm
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]