Search for: "Britt v. Britt"
Results 101 - 120
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2012, 9:59 pm
(Britt v Legal Aid Soc., Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
Thus, while it is clear that a plaintiff-client must prove negligence (i.e., that the defendant-attorney failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by members of the legal community), some cases hold that the negligence must be "the" proximate cause of damages (Britt v Legal Aid Socy., 95 NY2d 443, 446 [2000]; see e.g. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:15 pm
– Chicago lawyer Richard Beem on his blog, Beem on Patents Remijas v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm
A Building Component does not become Common Area just because it was placed or built on the Common Area -- California HOA attorney David Swedelson blogs on a recent appellate case that sounds strikingly similar to our Court of Appeal’s ruling in Wentworth Condo Corp. 198 v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am
The termination of a criminal proceeding is relevant for claims for malicious prosecution and legal malpractice arising out of a criminal proceeding (see Britt v Legal Aid Socy., 95 NY2d 443, 445-448 [2000]). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
That’s what the North Carolina Supreme Court held in Britt v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm
Igo's The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America, Cyrus Farivar's Habeas Data: Privacy vs. the Rise of Surveillance Tech, Mary Ziegler's Beyond Abortion: Roe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
“[A]n individual convicted of a criminal offense must be able to assert his innocence or a colorable claim of innocence before he can pursue a claim against his attorney for legal malpractice arising out of the criminal proceeding” (Britt v Legal Aid Soc., Inc., 95 NY2d 443, 445, 718 NYS2d 264 [2000]). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
Terry and Britt McClung also made significant contributions. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:08 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
(People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:22 am
The court observed that under Britt v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:34 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Gilbert v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Downs v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Thus, while it is clear that a plaintiff-client must prove negligence (i.e., that the defendant-attorney failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by members of the legal community), some cases hold that the negligence must be "the" proximate cause of damages (Britt v Legal Aid Soc., 95 NY2d 443, 446; see e.g. [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
This was the question facing the UK Information Tribunal recently in Queen Mary University of London v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Alem Matthees. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
* BREAKING: Copyright, links to leaks, celebrity pics and free speech as CJEU to get a dekko at DekkerKatfriend Tobias Cohen Jehoram (De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek NV, Amsterdam) recounts a Dutch tale of links to unpublished pictures of a local celebrity named Britt Dekker before their launch on Playboy.* Have a niche time! [read post]
