Search for: "Britton v. Britton" Results 101 - 120 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2015, 10:34 am by J
Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36; Philips v Francis [2014] EWCA Civ 1395; and, Assethold Ltd v Watts [2014] UKUT 537 (LC). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:04 am by Nick Austin and Sofia Papaspyropoulou
Contractual interpretation The Court first set out to construe Clause 11 of the Charterparty by applying the following usual principles of construction: (a) Its meaning was to be assessed in the light of (i) its natural and ordinary meaning, (ii) any other relevant provisions of the contract, (iii) the overall purpose of the clause and the contract, (iv) the facts and circumstances known or assumed by the parties at the time that the contract was made, and (v) commercial common sense… [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm by Giles Peaker
That said, I was somewhat surprised at the weakness of some (not all) of their arguments – ‘the agreement can’t mean X because that would not be a good agreement for us’ was surely never going to be a flyer in the face of Arnold v Britton [2015] AC 1619, for instance. [read post]
19 May 2019, 10:01 am by Giles Peaker
Testing the foregoing conclusion further, it is helpful to have regard to the principles in paragraph 15 of Arnold v Britton . [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:59 am by Siobhan Hayes and Sarah Frost
  The Supreme Court in Arnold v Britton declined to bend the usual rules of construction in favour of the tenants of holiday chalets let on long leases. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:36 pm
Murphy from the Erie, PA law firm of MacDonald, Illig, Jones & Britton. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Camelot Guardian Management Ltd v Khoo (2018) EWHC 2296 (QB) (Not on Bailii for some reason. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am by stevemehta
Huelskamp for Defendant and Appellant Gregory Britton. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Monday 26 January 2015 the Court will hear the appeal of Arnold v Britton & Ors regarding the true interpretation of 5 versions of a clause which has been described as a service charge clause in the long lease agreement of 25 chalets in the respondent’s leisure park. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 12:27 pm
  As far back as 1977, however, the Supreme Court noted in Bates v. [read post]