Search for: "Brown, Etc. v. District Court, Etc." Results 101 - 120 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
Brown, 2023 VT 61 (mem.)On December 8, we have a case dealing with Rule 75 (review of governmental action) and a school district asking the civil division to stop the Human Rights Commission from investigating a complaint made by a student’s mother. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am by Ron Coleman
DiStefano of Philly.com reported that the University of Pennsylvania filed suit in federal district court to protect its well-known federally-registered rights in the WHARTON name and mark. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
City of Oakland (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 364, 373; Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ford, ProCD: Tidying Up After the Stranger on the Street Epstein thinks the district court’s decision in ProCD was doctrinalist while Easterbrook’s court of appeals opinion was properly functionalist. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
A company’s outside counsel was acting as an attorney-agent when doing a background investigation and therefore did not qualify as a reporting agency under the FCRA, ruled a federal court in the District of Columbia (Mattiaccio v G, II v DHA Group, Inc). [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
  The inset photo is of the US Courthouse for the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona in Phoenix, where Judges James Marlar, George Nielsen, Redfield Baum, Sarah Sharer Curley, Charles Case II, Eileen Hollowell, and Randolph Haines preside. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(The trustees, executors etc. settled before trial.) [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am by admin
Can be considered in child custody (See Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
Governor Brown once called him and one of his politically active sisters “billionaire bullies. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]