Search for: "Brown, Etc. v. District Court, Etc."
Results 101 - 120
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Additionally, this tally pertains only to books (as opposed to separately printed reports, opinions, articles, etc.) published during the Justices’ lifetimes. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:51 am
Ford, ProCD: Tidying Up After the Stranger on the Street Epstein thinks the district court’s decision in ProCD was doctrinalist while Easterbrook’s court of appeals opinion was properly functionalist. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
The Second District Court of Appeal upheld this rationale in Sexton v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
The Second District Court of Appeal upheld this rationale in Sexton v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 am
A terrible joke for a serious issue that has plagued the US farming community and US courts for years – most recently in an appeal from the Southern District of Indiana to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") in the case of Monsanto v Bowman. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:40 am
Brown v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
A common issue in a variety of cases — personal injury, workers’ compensation, tax, etc. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
Allen, decided with Brown v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
Pursuant to a Court Order dated February 5, 2009, t [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Citing to the recent decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
Cir. cases analyzing Bilski v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:45 am
Sharpe, etc. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:54 am
Etc. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
(Though I think all these were reversed/dissents—V’s Secret dissent, Charbucks district court; Beebe says Nikepal required a showing of effect on distinctiveness, but it didn’t seem to matter.) [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
" Westbrook, 231 S.W.3d at 397-98 (citing Brown v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
Federal district courts confirmed 93.7% of awards (164/175) before Hall Street, and 90.9% (30/33) after. [read post]
