Search for: "Brown v. Board of State Fair Managers" Results 101 - 120 of 172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
        Incompatibility of First Amendment defenses/theories between TM and right of publicity: 9th Circuit cases in which TM claims fail on First Amendment grounds, Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The scales have swung back and forwards starting with the laissez faire approach of the House of Lords in the famous Duke of Westminster case in which it was said that it was open to a taxpayer to arrange his affairs in whatever way he chose in order to minimise the tax payable. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am by Jay Yurkiw
Nemaha Brown Watershed Joint District No. 7, No. 06-CV-2248 (D. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by Ilya Somin
These include the reality that most blacks and virtually all women were excluded from the political processes that produced the original meaning of the most important parts of the Constitution, the claim that Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
Sixty years later, the Court's unanimous 1956 Brown v Board of Education decision held that separate schools for white and black children were unconstitutional because they were "inherently unequal. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
These miserly limitations on compensation for negligence by state and local entities have rightly received a torrent of criticism lately following the Indiana State Fair stage collapse. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]