Search for: "Bruce Kobayashi"
Results 101 - 108
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 7:49 pm
The case involves allegations that Funai breached a FRAND commitment, and thus, is an important decision in the debate over the appropriate scope of Section 2 in cases involving alleged breach of obligations made in the standard setting context (a subject I’ve written on with Bruce Kobayashi here and here, with former student Aubrey Stuempfle here, and on my own in partial defense of the D.C. [read post]
23 May 2010, 12:36 pm
Bruce Kobayashi and I in our recent Jurisdictional Competition for LLCs provide evidence that larger LLCs overwhelmingly choose to organize in Delaware, and that they do so to take advantage of the quality of Delaware’s legal system rather than because of any particular feature of its law. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm
In the headline to a Dec. 7 press release, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it, in concert with the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
For a more detailed exposition on some of the issues touched upon by this post, see my article with Bruce Kobayashi, Federalism, Substantive Preemption and Limits on Antitrust: An Application to Patent Holdup (forthcoming in the Journal of Competition Law and Economics). [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:33 am
Baker ignores this empirical, evidence-based non-interventionist critique, which, for example, has been the core of the position taken by modern academic skeptics of monopolization enforcement like myself, Dan Crane, Tim Muris, Bruce Kobayashi, Luke Froeb, and David Evans. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 5:53 pm
Danny Sokol makes some predictions about Post-Obama antitrust, and about my disappointment in what he perceives to be the likely direction of antitrust policy in the Obama administration: 1. increased challenges of mergers and monopolization cases, especially at DOJ 2. more consumer protection work at the FTC with a push to more expansive consumer rights 3. less language by US enforcers internationally about “convergence” and more on “harmonization” 4. a move… [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
Professor Schauer’s discussion of statistical significance, covered in my last post,[1] is curious for its disclaimer that “there is no claim here that measures of statistical significance map easily onto measures of the burden of proof. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Go big or go home, they say. [read post]
