Search for: "Butterworth v. Butterworth" Results 101 - 120 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
  NASA couldn't build a Saturn V today. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 5:42 am
The IPKat's twitchy whiskers - aided by the LexisNexis Butterworth service - have detected Luxim Corporation v Ceravision Ltd [2007] EWHC 1624 (Ch) (available here from BAILII), decided yesterday in the Patents Court by Mr Justice Warren - another of those small but important rulings on the mechanism that helps to determine which of two or more disputing parties is entitled to the rights in a patent.Luxim asserted that it was the successor in title to various rights, including… [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:50 pm
If you want to help Duncan in this exciting adventure, email him here with news of the litigation in your jurisdiction.Right: chocks away, as Duncan "Biggles" Bucknell" flies off around the world to service his clientele's international interestsOther scorecards on Duncan's website list the current state of play in the US v Czech Budweiser dispute (here), Ranbaxy's battle with Pfizer over Lipitor (here) and the Eli Lilly/Teva/Dr Reddy's fight over Zyprexa… [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:51 pm
A little late but no less welcome, the June 2007 issue of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property and Technology Cases has now been published. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 7:41 am
TML Financial Solutions Ltd v More Business Ltd and others is a decision of Mr Justice Rimer in the Chancery Division (High Court, England and Wales) yesterday. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:56 pm
He's talking about PennWell Publishing (UK) Limited v Isles and others, a Queen's Bench Division from Judge Justin Fenwick QC on Monday, 18 June, which was picked up by the LexisNexis Butterworths subscription-only service.PennWell was a business to business media company that ran conferences, exhibitions and research covering strategic global markets. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
LexisNexis Butterworth picked up a good trade mark case yesterday from the Chancery Division of the High Court for England and Wales: Riemann & Co and another v Lino Care Ltd, a ruling by Mr Justice Briggs on an application for interim injunctive relief. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:31 pm
A good example is Sayers and others v Smithkline Beecham plc and others, an England and Wales Queen's Bench Division last Wednesday from Mr Justice Keith, picked up by LexisNexis Butterworths' All England digests.The United States Department of Health and Human Services was involved in US proceedings in which it was alleged that the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and MR (measles, rubella) vaccinations in young children helped cause autism. [read post]
27 May 2007, 5:57 am
And well done, ZADNA (says Merpel), in coming up with such a bright, cheerful and seriously effective logo.The May 2007 issue of the IPKat's black and shiny Intellectual Property and Technology Cases, published by LexisNexis Butterworths as a paper-based handmaiden to its electronic service, has now reached his rain-saturated letterbox. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
Well done, LexisNexis Butterworths, for unearthing Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd and others [2007] EWHC 1251 (Ch), an obscure ruling by Mr Justice David Richards in the Chancery Division yesterday on a neat little passing-off point.Knight, a British citizen who lived in Australia, published three books in the UK between 1991 and 1996; each had the word 'Mythbusters' in its title. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:44 am
That's Systems Division Inc v Teknek Holdings Ltd and others [2007] CSOH 85. [read post]
6 May 2007, 11:59 am
More on Armenian design here and hereQuietly awaiting IPKat bloggie Jeremy on his return from the INTA Meeting in Chicago was his copy of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property and Technology Cases for April 2007. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:12 am
Fresh back from the INTA, the IPKat congratulates LexisNexis Butterworths for spotting two decisions that have not yet made it to BAILII or to Lawtel - one on patents, the other on trade marks and passing off.The patent case is Re Oneida Indian Nation [2007] EWHC 0954 (Pat), a Patents Court decision on Wednesday 2 May from Deputy Judge Christopher Floyd QC. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 3:12 pm
No need to repeat yourself, says Merpel.Right: without wanting to stick his neck out, the IPKat ventures to predict that interest in news and comment concerning IP continues to grow.What's in the March 2007 issue of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property & Technology Cases, the IPKat hears you ask. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 5:25 am
Another little IP gem from online subscription service LexisNexis Butterworths is the Chancery Division for England and Wales decision on Monday of Mr Justice Patten in Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd, so far unreported on BAILII.This was an application by Boehringer for ex parte interim injunctive relief to stop Vetplus publishing an advertisement and a press release in various journals relating to one of its products. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:11 pm
So far the IPKat has only found a note on European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc [2007] EWHC 600 (Ch) on LexisNexis Butterworth's subscription-only service. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 7:11 am
In this vein of thought the IPKat turns to LB Europe Ltd (trading as Dupont Liquid Packaging Systems) v Smurfit Bag in Box SA and another [2007] EWHC 510 (Pat), a Patents Court decision last Thursday from Roger Wyand QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, which seems to have escaped the attention of everyone except LexisNexis Butterworths' subscription service.LB and Smurfit both made and sold flexible 'bag-in-box' liquid packages containing tap units made… [read post]