Search for: "C"
Results 101 - 120
of 170,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2024, 12:44 pm
The typical example of who this will apply to is C Suite executives (like the CEO). [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
As the Board held in Cemex: “an employer violates Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by refusing to recognize, upon request, a union that has been designated as Section 9(a) representative by the majority of employees in an appropriate unit unless the employer promptly files a petition pursuant to Section 9(c)(1)(B) of the Act (an RM petition) to test the union’s majority status or the appropriateness of the unit, assuming that the union has not already filed a petition pursuant to… [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 10:55 am
Call DLP. (570) C-A-L-L-D-L-P. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 9:03 am
Matter of H-C-R-C- (1) Applicants bear the burden of establishing their own credibility, and no statute or legal precedent compels an Immigration Judge to conclude that an applicant’s testimony is credible. (2) Rape is sufficiently severe to constitute torture and can never be a lawful sanction under the Convention Against Torture. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
., 2024 SCC 20, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) clarified the requirements to contract out of statutory conditions under the Sale of Goods Act, RSO 1990, c S.1 (“SGA”). [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 8:10 am
Pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10.1)(c)(3), the... [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on June 18, 2024. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:50 am
Doubling up on the results of Activision, in response to the Court’s finding of a violation of DGCL § 251(c) where the corporation had included a brief summary of the merger agreement in the proxy statement sent with a separate notice to the stockholders that did not include a brief summary of the merger agreement, a proposed DGCL § 232(g) would allow a corporation to satisfy the stockholder notice requirement for a merger agreement when such agreements and brief summaries… [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:57 am
A column in Foreign Policy by Robert C. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:38 am
The same is true for Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
.# # #DECISION591 v C. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
IMPALA works on a range of key issues for its members, runs various award schemes and has a programme aimed at businesses who want to develop a strategic relationship with the independent sector – Friends of IMPALA About A2IMA2IM is a 501(c)(6) not-for-profit trade organization headquartered in New York City that exists to support and strengthen the independent recorded music sector. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:58 am
Anti-SLAPP motions in Ontario are governed by the s.137 of Courts of Justice Act, RSO 1990 (“CJA”) and, in British Columbia by the Protection of Public Participation Act, SBC 2019, c 3 (“PPPA”). [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:30 am
Under the terms of the SEC’s order in the case, the company consented, on a neither admit nor deny basis, to the entry of a C&D enjoining future violations of Exchange Act Section 13(b)(2)(B) and Rule 13a-15(a). [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:20 am
., is distinguished Alfred C. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:09 am
Kavitha Chennupati is Senior Director of Product Management at SS&C Blue Prism. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
According to David C. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:58 am
For example, a study available through the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed database found that, the “Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines,” and that “[c]ombined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
A crime under this category is classified as a Class A, B, or C Misdemeanor, with A being the most severe and C being the least. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm
Este nuevo cambio de política permite a los cónyuges no ciudadanos quehan vivido en los EE. [read post]
