Search for: "C Booker" Results 101 - 120 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 3:33 pm by familoo
, Post 2 Update on the Essex C-Section Case) . [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:18 pm by Elie Mystal
[BoredPanda] * I wonder what Kamala Harris, Deval Patrick, and Cory Booker have in common to get them so much hate from supposedly left-wing sources? [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:16 pm
Most interesting was Prof Chanenson (Villanova) who argued that 3582(c)(2) was *not* a resentencing, but more like an "equitable sentencing procedure", and therefore Booker had no relevance, and that the USSC and/or Congress would have the right to make this retroactivity fairly restrictive (so as to minimize the burden on the courts, on the Marshals who have to transport prisoners, etc.) [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:35 pm
Holman, Death by a Thousand Cases: After Booker, Rita, and Gall, the Guidelines Still Violate the Sixth Amendment Meghaan Cecilia McElroy, Possession is Nine Tenths of the Law: But Who Really Owns a Church's Property in the Wake of a Religious Split Within a Hierarchical Church? [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 7:20 am
Booker, the concerns raised in Kikumura "were put to rest. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
The Court also held that Booker is “inapplicable” to § 3582(c)(2) motions for reduction of sentence because it is “‘a Supreme Court decision, not a retroactively applicable guideline amendment by the Sentencing Commission. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 4:32 pm
This auto-crash was investigated by the Missouri State Highway Patrol and with the assistance of troop C. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:11 am by Solomon Wisenberg
Notably, pursuant to the memo, “[c]harges should not be filed simply to exert leverage to induce a plea. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:31 am
Even post-Booker sentencings require the district court to calculate the guidelines. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
Held: "[W]e hold that we do not have jurisdiction to review a sentence that was imposed pursuant to a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement and was not contingent on the guidelines, where the defendant claims only that there was some error in the district court's calculation of the guidelines or application of Booker. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:44 pm by lawmrh
In Arizona, Ethical Rule 1.2 (c) says that “A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest post by Professor Andrew C. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 2:22 pm
"); §5K2.0(c) and Commentary thereto.And what of the Court's adoption of the government's reference to the extent of the departure being 99.89%? [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm by Steve Kalar
The en banc argument made it clear that the Ninth is in the midst of a fight over its Taylor approach, the most important sentencing issue since Booker. [read post]