Search for: "C. BARNETT" Results 101 - 120 of 420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2018, 2:00 pm by Randy Barnett
(Day/Part/Time references are to C*SPAN videos) Opening statement (3:15:54): My judicial philosophy is straightforward. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by Eric Quitugua
Booker, of Morgan Stanley • Brittany Barnett-Byrd, of the Buried Alive Project • Liz Cedillo-Pereira, of the city of Dallas • CeCe Cox, of the Resource Center • Lacy Durham, of Deloitte Tax • Hilda C. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Randy Barnett
(Day/Part/Time references are to C*SPAN videos) Opening statement (3:15:54): My judicial philosophy is straightforward. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 10:29 am by The Law Office of John Guidry II
State, 618 So.2d 174, 176 (Fla. 1993) (holding that to preserve a contemporaneous objection to voir dire, a defendant must renew the objection prior to the jury being sworn or accept the jury subject to the specific prior objection in order to “apprise[ ] the trial judge that [the defendant] still believed reversible error had occurred”); Barnette v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Scott Pryor profpryor Campbell contracts bankruptcy law & religion Gowri Nanayakkara gowri_nana Canterburgy Christ Church (UK)       Rhonda Powell DrRLPowell Canterbury (NZ)       César Cuauhtémoc Garcia Hernandez crimmigration Capital       Ambreena Manji AmbreenaManji Cardiff       Michelle Adams mvadams12 Cardozo Constitutiona [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm by Randy Barnett
Instead, I look for a judge who (a) will seek to follow the original meaning of the text of the Constitution, (b) has the intestinal fortitude to invalidate the acts of the majoritarian branches, (c) understands that judges are agents of the people, to whom they owe a duty to hold the other branches within their constitutional powers. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am by Marty Lederman
 Barnette].So far, so good:  If the state compels an individual to actually say something that betrays her convictions--the classic case being the compulsion of the young Jehovah's Witness students in Barnette to attest their allegiance to the United States, contrary to their genuine beliefs--there's a First Amendment problem. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Deepa Varadarajan's new article, The Trade Secret-Contract Interface, published in the Iowa Law Review, explores the role of contracts in trade secret law. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Wells Barnett, in a photograph by Mary Garrity from c. 1893 Her activism was not restricted to her personal life. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
., NW, Washington, DC, on Sunday, July 8 at 1:00 PM.Tonight at 10:45 pm, C-SPAN 3 airs the discussion, held in Supreme Court chamber and co-hosted by the Supreme Court Historical Society and the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, between Randy Barnett, Georgetown University, and Richard Primus, University of Michigan, on interpreting the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Barnette (1943), which held that schools may not compel children to say the Pledge of Allegiance and engage in a flag salute—suggested that speech compulsions "could be commanded only on even more immediate and urgent grounds" than speech restrictions. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm by Jennifer Mascott
As prolific appointments clause scholar Kent Barnett has pointed out, the Lucia decision was about as narrow as it could be. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Sandy Levinson
 But where issues are truly important, precedential "reasoning" has relatively little to be said for it  If I shared Randy Barnett's, Richard Epstein's, or Clarence Thomas's views of constitutional meaning and, more importantly, what constituted the most desirable kind of polity, then I would have no particular commitment to maintaining New Deal precedents in all of their glory. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Steven Barnett considered the influence of the press on the decision here. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:18 am by Jani Ihalainen
The name of the goods is simply the single use of the word, not double, and therefore escapes the remit of section 12(1)(c).The Board then moved onto section 12(1)(b), which prevents the registration of clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive marks from the point of view of the average consumer. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:18 am by Jani Ihalainen
The name of the goods is simply the single use of the word, not double, and therefore escapes the remit of section 12(1)(c).The Board then moved onto section 12(1)(b), which prevents the registration of clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive marks from the point of view of the average consumer. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
," an anti-libel injunction should (a) say, "Defendants ... are enjoined from libelously stating," (b) expressly provide that any criminal contempt prosecutions will be conducted before a jury, and (c) expressly provide that the injunction could not be enforced through threat of confinement for civil contempt. [read post]