Search for: "C. P.1"
Results 101 - 120
of 11,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
., No. 20 C 3488, Slip Op. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 3:53 am
P. 37(c)(1). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Please see NYCRR § 153.1(g)(1). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:04 pm
ANTEPROYECTO DE PRIMERA RESOLUCION DE MODIFICACIONES A LA RESOLUCION MISCELANEA FISCAL PARA 2012 Y SU ANEXO 1-A Con fundamento en los artículos 16 y 31 de la Ley Orgánica de la Administración Pública Federal, 33, fracción I, inciso g) del Código Fiscal de la Federación, 14, fracción III de la Ley del Servicio de Administración [...] [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:27 am
Société fiduciaire nationale d’expertise comptable v Ministre du Budget, des Comptes publics et de la Fonction publique (Case C-119/09); [2011] WLR (D) 127 “National legislation totally prohibiting the members of a regulated profession from engaging in canvassing was contrary to article 24(1) of European Parliament and Council Directive 2006/123/EC of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ 2006 L 376, p 36). [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:50 am
Dados los derroteros de la Universidad pública, la legislación en materia universitaria y la jurisprudencia sobre autonomÃÂa universitaria, libertad de cátedra y reclutamiento de profesorado, la prestigiosa Universidad de Tokameroke ha conseguido explicar porqué Dios jamás serÃÂa… [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:23 am
Sancionada: Julio 27 de 2011 Promulgada de Hecho: 24 de agosto de 2011 Publicación: 29 de agosto de 2011 El Senado y Cámara de Diputadosde la Nación Argentinareunidos en Congreso, etc.sancionan con fuerza deLey: ARTICULO 1º — Incorpórase como tercer párrafo del artículo 275 de la ley 20.744 —Ley de Contrato de Trabajo— (t.o. 1976) y [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:11 am
Any personal health information custodian to which the Personal Health Information Act, SNL 2008, c P-7.01, applies is exempt from the application of Part 1 of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act in respect of the collection, use and disclosure of personal health information that occurs in Newfoundland and Labrador. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:44 am
., No. 18 C 1376, Slip Op. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:09 am
P. 12(b)(1), (6) & (7) motion to dismiss. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
le juge Gagnon: En retenant que l’interprétation la plus restrictive qu’il faut donner à l’article 39 (1) c) de la Loi sur le système de justice pénale pour les adolescents se trouve dans le texte anglais, la Cour suprême, dans R. c. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
NOTAS (1) Jacobsen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 2:49 am
C-KORE claims to have learned in February 2023 that NOVAWELL, one of its former customers, had developed a competing product, called “SICOM”, which reproduces at least all the features of independent claims 1 and 15 and dependent claims 4, 5, 6 and 14. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 11:56 am
” On appeal, the defendant “challenge[d] the portion of [G.L. c.258B, §3(p)] that permits victims to provide an impact statement ‘as to a recommended sentence. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:25 pm
El 1º de Agosto entrará en vigencia el Nuevo Código Civil y Comercial. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:01 am
On 23 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its ruling in Gömböc, C-237/19, ECLI:EU:C:2020:296, concerning the interpretation of Article 3(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) of the previous Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 (now Article 4(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) of Directive 2015/2436). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
By: Cédric P. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:55 pm
P. 11(c)(1), the rule that forbids judicial involvement in plea negotiations, because the defendant had requested a settlement conference as authorized by local rules and the plea deal and resulting guilty plea were the result of that conference.The defendant was charged in December 2009 with ten counts involving wire fraud. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:56 am
" [Hats off to Jonathan C. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
Last week, the North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed a defendant’s conviction under G.S. 90-95(d1)(1)(c), which makes it unlawful to “[p]ossess a pseudoephedrine product if [a] person has a prior conviction for the possession or manufacture of methamphetamine. [read post]
