Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. COLORADO" Results 101 - 120 of 502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Murphy v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
The Supreme Court, in another 6-3 decision, ruled in favor of a Colorado design company that objected to creating wedding websites for same-sex couples. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:40 am by Terry Hart
California, 412 US 546, 560 (1973).17 USC § 301(a).H.R. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 pm by Stuart Blake
On January 29, 2010, the California Court of Appeal decided in Lhotka v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:31 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Privacy Rights of Companies: Trade Secrets and Social Media – New York attorney Michael Schmidt of Cozen O’Connor on the Social Media Employment Law Blog MetLife Pays $40 Million To Settle Allegations That It Failed To Properly Identify And Pay Life Insurance Beneficiaries – Los Angeles lawyer Bob McKennon of McKennon Schindler on the firm’s California Insurance Litigation Blog  Maker’s Mark’s “Mark” Is Protected… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:11 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Superior Court, a big victory for employers in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:55 am by randal shaheen
Interestingly enough, the same day as the New York Supreme Court decided the Tempur-Pedic case, the California OAG entered into a settlement with Bioelements,a small Colorado-based manufacturer of skin care products sold to beauty salons throughout California and on the internet. [read post]