Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT" Results 101 - 120 of 2,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2019, 8:14 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Additional Resources: Statewide delivery policy ‘critical’ to cannabis industry success, California insiders say ahead of key court case, Dec. 19, 2019, By John Schroyer, Marijuana Business Daily [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:49 am by Nassiri Law
Medical Center, Feb. 10, 2015, California Court of Appeals, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three More Blog Entries: Bailey v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1026; Reynolds v. [read post]
  In two companion cases, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided whether a federal district court could properly exercise jurisdiction over climate change suits brought against energy companies by cities and counties in California. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:56 am by Michael Fausey
In a rare development, a California state court of appeals has opined on the requirements for obtaining authorization for background checks pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:29 pm
In rejecting this challenge, we part company with one line of cases stating that evidence of industry custom and practice is always inadmissible in a strict products liability action, and with a recent case suggesting such evidence is always admissible. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am by Andrew Lustigman
" An association that represented the video-game and software industries filed a pre-enforcement action against the Governor of California claiming that the statute violated the First Amendment's freedom of speech guarantee. [read post]
The California Secretary of State has appealed a decision by the Los Angeles County Superior Court striking down the second of California’s two board diversity laws, which required all publicly traded companies headquartered in California to include a minimum number of female directors. [read post]