Search for: "CASE v. CASE" Results 101 - 120 of 324,298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm by Jane Gennarelli
A couple of weeks ago, we started a case study blog series – we’re looking at the precedent-setting Zubulake v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:00 am by Jane Gennarelli
For those of you who may be familiar with the Zubulake v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
The Outer House considered the cases of Hunter v Hanley [1955] SC 200 and Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 W.L.R. 582. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:49 am by Hugh Southey QC, Matrix
The post Case Comment: EM v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Here is the Complaint in a recently-filed federal case in Oregon: Krela v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:48 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Moreno Belloso, Natalia, Google v Commission (Google Shopping): A Case Summary (November 17, 2021). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
Several of the essays place cases in their historical context in ways that change our understanding of the case's significance. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am by Rosalind Earis, 6KBW
In particular, he highlights the fallacy of thinking of “human rights law”, as governed by ECtHR case law, is a distinct area of the law. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:30 am
Stringer and others v HM Revenue and Customs (Case C-520/06); Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (Case C-350/06); [2009] WLR (D) 13 “Employees who by reason of illness were not able to take paid annual leave in the year in which it was due were not for that reason to be deprived of the right to paid [...] [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:22 pm by InternationalLaw Blogger
Supreme Court decided a case involving the Convention Against Torture, Nasrallah v Barr. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
The relevant statutory provisions together with a summary of the approaches adopted in the lower courts can be found in Case Preview: Campbell v Gordon. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:24 pm by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The case in common is Barnett v Schwartz ;2007 NY Slip Op 09712 [47 AD3d 197] . [read post]
The Supreme Court has delivered its judgment in the case of Gohil v Gohil, which it heard at the same time as Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, a case also dealing with non-disclosure and whether or not the duped spouse has the right to reopen their claim. [read post]