Search for: "COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO."
Results 101 - 120
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2010, 9:55 am
In the aftermath of this ruling, Coca-Cola released a statement expressing their confidence that the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and will ultimately be rejected. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
The Coca-Cola Company, No. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:54 pm
BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. - Los Angeles attorney Brian Van Vleck of Van Vleck Turner & Zaller in the firm's California Labor & Employment Defense Blog Gulf Coast Spill Impacts Legislation in Trenton, NJ - New Jersey lawyer Edward McTernan of Gibbons on the firm's blog, Real Property & Environmental Law Alert eBay sued for $3.8 Billion - - Patent Troll or David v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:41 pm
BCI Coca-Cola Bottling. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:00 pm
” Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Co., SA (CCH) recently disclosed that “…the World Cup also enables us to realize significant benefits from the unique marketing opportunities of one of the largest and most prestigious sporting events in the world. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jun. 10, 2010; pub. ord. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 88 Ga.App. 241, 246, 76 S.E.2d 408 (1953), a case which closely parallels the facts here. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm
It imported and offered 144 bottles for sale in Australia. 15 bottles were sold after 7 May 2004 but prior to the transfer of the registered trade mark from Barefoot Cellars to Gallo on 17 January 2005. [read post]
16 May 2010, 11:53 am
Coca Cola Co., No. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:14 am
The Coca-Cola Co. has successfully obtained summary judgment in a case alleging that the company unfairly marketed its Coca-Cola Classic soft drink as “original formula” despite allegedly having substituted high-fructose corn syrup for the ordinary table sugar it used when the drink was introduced. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 1:00 pm
Coca-Cola sent MACOM a mailer asking her to forward the bottle and glass shard. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:59 am
A few days after her first complaint, Macom emailed Coca-Cola asking for a monetary settlement.Coca-Cola sent her a mailer asking her to forward the bottle and glass shard. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:46 pm
Coca-Cola sent MACOM a mailer asking her to forward the bottle and glass shard. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
By Mark P. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:00 am
Such is the case with Coca-Cola’s “contour bottle. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:38 am
District Court in the Northern District of California, against Coca-Cola Co, accusing the company of making false health claims about “Vitaminwater”. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:12 pm
The appeals court immediately focused on a similar case that it decided in 2001, the often-cited decision in Bibby v Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257 (3d Cir. 2001). [read post]
