Search for: "CORNELL V. STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a district court may enter a restitution order beyond the time limit prescribed in 18 USC § 3664(d)(5) [text] if the sentencing court made clear prior to the deadline that restitution would be ordered. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:04 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Henderson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:02 pm
Guarnieri [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that state and local government employees may not sue their employers for retaliation under the Petition Clause [FAC backgrounder] of the First Amendment when they petition the government on matters of private concern. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:02 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-1 Monday in Taylor v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:11 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Skilling v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
United States [Cornell LII Backgrounder] that a federal sentencing law does not permit sentencing judges to impose or lengthen prison terms for the purpose of fostering the defendant's rehabilitation. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 8:16 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that time granted to prepare pretrial motions is not automatically excludable under the Speedy Trial Act [18 USC § 3161(h)(1) text]. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:08 am
The Court ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Herring v. [read post]
7 Apr 2003, 10:39 am
No. 01-1107, Virginia v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:34 pm
[Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report], allowing a class action lawsuit against the company to proceed. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
In Williams v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:09 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 8-1 in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:21 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a federal "aggravated identity theft" statute [18 USC § 1028A(a)(1)] applies only to individuals who knowingly use another person's identification documents. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:18 pm
In Herring v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:41 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2004, 3:10 am
The case is Yarborough v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:10 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:43 am
During closing arguments, the attorneys for the plaintiffs argued that the state ban on same-sex marriage [JURIST news archive] violates the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause [Cornell LII backgrounders] of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution [text]. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:16 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
United States, arguing that DOMA violates the Equal Protection Clause [Cornell LII backgrounder] by precluding... [read post]
