Search for: "Cable v. Cable"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,998
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 6:56 am
The case – Jones v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
Thomas and Another v Thomas (1223/2021) [2023] ZASCA 36 (31 March 2023) [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decided AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
If the author also relied on information from another document, such as a CIA cable, they should “carry forward” the classification level for the cable’s information into the new document. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:49 am
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:15 am
A New York court affirmed the Public Service Commission’s (“PSC”) approval of a high-voltage electric transmission cable related to an off-shore wind farm project in Matter of Citizens for the Preservation of Wainscott, Inc. v New York State Public Service Commission. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:29 pm
State v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am
Federal Communications Commission, the Court upheld First Amendment challenges to federal cable legislation in a case brought by cable content creators, with no cable companies as parties. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 2:09 pm
Fort Bragg is in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA DMA, and the station sought in its petition to add Santa Rosa, CA to that DMA so it could compel the cable operator there to carry it. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 1:53 am
This same profit motive exists when a broadcaster or cable company is approached with an attack ad. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential opinion in FS.com v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential opinion in FS.com v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:18 am
Council on American-Islamic Relations v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:20 pm
So the City definitely gets to charge the electricity company (and gas company, cable company, internet provider, etc. etc.) fees for that access.But, of course, the company just turns around and charges its customers those same costs. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
The need for something like FISA was made clear as early as 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in the famous Keith Case that electronic collection in domestic security cases fell within the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement as set forth in Katz v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
(Aberdare Cables (Pty) Ltd v Legoale and Another (J 1712/2022) [2023] ZALCJHB 29 (20 February 2023) [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:31 pm
This was not a heavy lift for the three-judge panel deciding Cunningham v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 12:03 pm
Under the BTOP rules, (a) the grant-funded property was subject to a federal property interest (the “Federal Interest”) for the duration of its statutory useful life period (in the case of fiber optic cable, 20 years); (b) recipients were required to record the Federal Interest; (c) recipients could not encumber property that was subject to the Federal Interest; and (d) recipients could not close on a transaction involving the sale of grant-funded property still subject to the… [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 4:17 am
Here is the complaint: Cooley v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
