Search for: "California v. Evans" Results 101 - 120 of 662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Mar. 1, 2004)..........................34Def.'s Answer to Compl., Evans v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:15 pm
Suppose you -- as constitutionally-sensitive activist -- think that California's gay marriage ban violates the federal Constitution's protection of "equal protection of the laws" -- and think that Romer v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am by JB
Bringing a challenge to same-sex marriage to federal court in 2010 is a little like trying to get the federal courts to decide Lawrence in 1972 or Loving in 1948, immediately after California's decision in Perez v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:09 am by Florian Mueller
The Federal Trade Commission just submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California its witness list for Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:14 am
See Ass’n of California Water Agencies v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:13 am by Susan Brenner
Toy and Wren also relied on the California Court of Appeals' decision in People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:10 am by Sherica Celine
Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast Listen to attorney Tim Taylor of Holland & Knight discuss the implications of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:03 pm by Jason Mazzone
Evans prohibits an amendment to the California constitution to overturn a judicial ruling that the state constitution protects the right of same-sex couples to marry (and that resulted in same-sex marriages being performed in the state).For reasons I explained at the time, Reinhardt's approach in Perry makes little sense as an application of Romer. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
Evan Tsen Lee, University of California, Hastings, draws upon his expertise as a federal courts scholar and takes an intriguing, biographical approach to his subject in Judicial Restraint in America: How the Ageless Wisdom of the Federal Courts was Invented. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Moving to trademarks, the blog also covered the INTA announcement about the opening in 2017 of the Latin America representative office in Santiago (Chile).Over at MARQUES Class 46, the blog discusses the judgment in the Gucci v. [read post]