Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 101 - 120
of 34,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2019, 11:24 pm
The California Supreme Court in Edwards v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 9:11 am
The ruling rejected a challenge to AB 540, a California law that allows students who have attended California high schools for three years and received their diploma or GED to pay in-state tuition rates at public colleges and universities in California. [read post]
22 May 2009, 12:20 am
In California-Nevada Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
California, the Supreme Court held that law enforcement officers may not search an arrested person’s cellphone incident to arrest without a warrant. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 8:43 pm
Catsouras v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:00 pm
The logic for riding with traffic is based on the fact that California law views a bicyclist, or pedicab, or the like as "another vehicle on the road" subject to the same laws. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:56 am
Dynamex involved a wage claims brought by a driver under California law. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 6:14 pm
The California on-call pay laws are largely based on balancing fairness between employees and employers. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm
Crest v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:09 pm
Answer: No, according to the Fourth District court of appeal in Brack v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:50 am
Check out the citation to People v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:17 am
California law with respect to PAGA is pretty straightforward. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 1:09 pm
Hassaid to consider a California agricultural union organizing law. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:49 am
In Vergara v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:35 am
Eagly, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law; University of Oxford - Border Criminologies March 19, 2015 109 Northwestern University Law Review 933 (2015) UCLA School of Law Research Paper... [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:55 pm
Ratinoff While everyone awaits the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:37 pm
Apologies for the delay in posting this; just dropped the in-laws off at LAX and am catching up on things.At any rate, I say "good" rather than "great" because while Martinez v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:26 am
Plaintiffs in Sanchez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:57 am
It may soon be up to the California Supreme Court to determine the applicable scope of AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
