Search for: "California v. Lord"
Results 101 - 120
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
And this actually should make sense in connection with Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
California — the famous "fuck the draft" case in which the Court recognized that being offensive is an important part of expression:Brunetti invokes Cohen v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
” (Sagaser v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
Last Week in the Courts On Tuesday 13 November 2018 there was a hearing in the Privy Council (Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lords Briggs and Kitchin) of an Isle of Man libel appeal, Nugent v Willers. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger Lady Hale, Lord Clarke Lord Wilson and Lord Toulson. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Hurd v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
(Initiatives like this one have failed in California, Maine, and Hawaii.) [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
The Court decided that it did not have jurisdiction and that the proper place to bring the claim is either Ireland or California. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:08 pm
Maybe not anymore - if the theory of this California case is adopted in other jurisdictions: This excellent article is a must read: "Barred by Lunatics Law: How a preexisting substituted judgment order can preclude posthumous challenges to a will in California (and possibly elsewhere): the lesson of Murphy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
This was the holding also in the recent California appellate case of Belz v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
This was the holding also in the recent California appellate case of Belz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
It’s been gnawing at me lately for some reason: Brown v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Schwartz – Section Vice Chair, Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP PLENARY SESSION #1, 9:15 a.m. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:36 pm
This glorious Gandhianisation persuaded me to conscientise punitive justice in two Supreme Court rulings where my opinion prevailed. .The Supreme Court of California has acknowledged in two cases the cruel and degrading effect of dalay: People V. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Rivera v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc (Property, intangible) US CAFC reopens DNA detection patent case between Enzo Biochem and former Applera (Law360) US District Court E D California: Antitrust and patent misuse claims tossed in case alleging California Table Grape Commission accepted royalties from growers for invalid patents covering grape varieties (Law360) US: AntiCancer launches second effort to convince federal court that Cambridge Research & Instrumentation… [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
The Court saw the license denial as an effort by New York to horde a resource and thereby keep prices for its consumers low.Edwards v California (1941) considered a challenge to a California law aimed at reducing the influx of dustbowl indigents to the state. [read post]
