Search for: "California v. Sims"
Results 101 - 120
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright) Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango) China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon) Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost (JIPLP)… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Co [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica) United States US General Open source, digital… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica) United States US General Open source, digital… [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:31 am
California's anti-hacking statute: The court says (citing to Facebook v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 12:35 pm
The suit claimed Apple was selling a device that contributed to electronic surveillance, stalking, fear and, ultimately, death: Hughes v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) Germany Regional Court Munich I partly rejects Bavarian state government’s attempt to use copyright laws to prevent reprints of Nazi newspaper by British publisher Peter McGee (IPKat) (The IP Factor) India Delhi High Court restores PPL’s right to sue for copyright infringement on behalf of its members: PPL v Hotel Gold Regency & Ors (Spicy IP) Punitive damages as effective penalty (International Law Office) Religion and IP: The tales… [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Sims, and Loving v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:59 pm
The cases are Viacom International Inc et al v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
In the 20th volume, Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, and Howard Gillman, chancellor of the University of California, Irvine, have written “The Religion Clauses: The Case for Separating Church and State,” which focuses on what the authors see as the troubling directions our conservative justices are now taking insofar as they reject the idea of a wall separating church and state. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Sanders and Reynolds v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:19 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Summers v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
