Search for: "California v. Vaughn"
Results 101 - 120
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
Once fierce opponents in Bush v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
California. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Hollingsworth)Vikram David Amar, Precisely What Will, or Should, Happen to Same-Sex Marriage in California if the Supreme Court Finds in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:39 pm
The case has been assigned to Chief Judge Vaughn Walker. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:20 pm
District Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
Vaughn, 2012 U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:01 am
There was lots of news coverage, including at NPR, about the hearing yesterday morning on the motion to vacate the decision of USDC Judge Vaughn Walker in the same sex marriage litigation in California. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm
Browning Courthouse in San Francisco, California. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:32 pm
Bush in 1990, where he has served until being elevated to Chief Judge upon the retirement of Judge Vaughn Walker in late 2010. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:51 pm
The ban was struck down by a District Judge who has since retired, Vaughn R. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 5:15 am
[Romer v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:30 am
Perry v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon Civic… [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
11/06/09 FindLaw.com: In my last column, Part One in this series, I discussed some recent developments in the federal court litigation over the legality of California's Proposition 8 [Perry v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:12 pm
. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ California Court of Appeal Holds that Home State "Permission To Sue" Procedures Are Substantive Rules After All In a case of first impression, the California Court of Appeal in Vaughn v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
District Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit extended its decision to keep sealed the videos from Perry v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
Schwarzenegger (the federal trial on California’s same-sex marriage initiative, Proposition 8). [read post]
