Search for: "Call v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2016, 4:33 am
A copy of the opinion in Watkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:36 pm
It is a decision from Superior Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Mullins v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:50 pm
This has been a rule of law since at least the 1992 United States Supreme Court case of Monell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 5:55 pm
Schumacher v City of Roswell, 2016 WL 3086089 (GA App 6/1/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Rezoning, Uncategorized [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:39 pm
So the only testimony is going to come from the deposition.So those eight minutes are pretty darn precious.Still, the Court of Appeal says that the statute says what it says, and that the Legislature made the call. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:31 pm
Superior Court Judge John C. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:03 am
From Rogowski v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Citing Morillion v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:12 am
Superior Court, 2011 Cal. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:43 pm
Seymore v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Third, the Court held that California law applied, despite a contract clause calling for Illinois choice of law and venue. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:01 pm
Superior Court (Romero), 13 Cal.4th 497, the California Supreme Court held that a Superior Court Judge could strike an allegation or vacate a finding under the Three Strikes law if they saw fit to do so in the interests of justice. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
You can't really argue that much with today's opinion from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for Benson. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:10 pm
Let's call it BUI.So they charge him with a felony. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 11:57 am
In another pro-policyholder ruling in Delaware, a Delaware Superior Court judge has denied a group of insurers’ application for certification of interlocutory appeal in the long-running D&O dispute, Verizon Communications Inc. et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:26 am
In September 2010, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania surprised attorneys across the state by holding that correspondence between an attorney and an expert witness who the attorney intends to call at trial is discoverable. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 5:00 pm
Superior Court (1985) 39 Cal.3d 740, in which the California Supreme Court called the contingent fee agreement between a city government and a private attorney in a lawsuit against an adult bookstore "inappropriate under the circumstances. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
She stated someone called the police because they saw he “had owies everywhere. [read post]
