Search for: "Canada v. Client Services Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Against this body of case law, PCCM pointed to judgments in several other common law jurisdictions, including: Ireland: C&A Modes v C&A (Waterford) Ltd which Lord Neuberger said [39] shows a “misapprehension” of the reasoning in Crazy Horse; Canada: Orkin Exterminating Co Inc v Pestco Co of Canada Ltd, which was “of no assistance” [40] since the US-based plaintiff had thousands of customers in CanadaNew Zealand:… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Over Google’s objections, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Over Google’s objections, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:14 am
The Supreme Court of Canada weighed in on the issue this year in Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm
Canada In TLS Health Services Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am
$20,000 each Singleton v Leisureworld Inc. (2008), 166 ACWS (3d) 886, 2008 CarswellOnt 2128 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
As the Divisional Court recently said in Bishop v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:05 am
MDS Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 5:20 am
Crown Metal Packaging Canada LP, 2011 ONCA 469. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:39 am
In 2004, Ira Leesfield and Tom Scolaro tried the matter of Kemp v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 7:19 am
Nylene Canada Inc. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
The Court said what it meant and meant what is said in CCH v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
A registered trade-mark entitles the trade-mark owner to exclusive right to use that trade-mark in association with the identified goods and services throughout Canada for 15 years.[9] The term for trade-mark protection is renewable. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
A registered trade-mark entitles the trade-mark owner to exclusive right to use that trade-mark in association with the identified goods and services throughout Canada for 15 years.[9] The term for trade-mark protection is renewable. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:13 pm
In late 2010, the Competition Tribunal imposed AMPs of C $20,000 and $10,000 against parties in Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:17 pm
In late 2010, the Competition Tribunal imposed AMPs of C $20,000 and $10,000 against parties in Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 8:03 am
This concept of acting "in the interests of the organization" was discussed by the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, which we wrote about and quoted relevant portions here. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
A registered trade-mark entitles the trade-mark owner to exclusive right to use that trade-mark in association with the identified goods and services throughout Canada for 15 years.[9] The term for trade-mark protection is renewable. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
A registered trade-mark entitles the trade-mark owner to exclusive right to use that trade-mark in association with the identified goods and services throughout Canada for 15 years.[9] The term for trade-mark protection is renewable. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
En 2004, Benisti Import-Export inc. [read post]
