Search for: "Canon v. USA"
Results 101 - 120
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
The canon against superfluity assists only where a competing interpretation gives effect " 'to every clause and word of a statute.' " Duncan v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:34 pm
She maintains that the "neutral principles" approach of Jones v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:37 am
(Schofield v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
” NPR, the Christian Science Monitor, USA Today, JURIST, ABA Journal, and Bloomberg all have additional coverage of the decision. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
But the Episcopal Church (USA) does -- all because of a repeated misreading of gratuitous dictum laid down by that careful scholar of the Constitution, Justice Harry Blackmun (the outcome-based author of Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:38 pm
" The Appeals Court said, "This canon, however, has force only where a statute is ambiguous. . . and as we have explained, section 7912(d), read in light of UMTRCA's other provisions, is unambiguous. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:30 am
For shows from 0x17 onward, the license for those materials is the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 3.0 USA license (CC-By-SA-3.0 USA). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
The reasoning, thanks to Justice Blackmun's obiter dictum in Jones v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:07 pm
And it would seem axiomatic that such meaning must be consistent with the normal canons of what constitutes “copyright law”. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
As briefly reported in this previous post, the Fifth District Court of Appeal today reversed the grant of summary adjudication by the Fresno trial court in favor of the Episcopal Church (USA) and Bishop Jerry Lamb. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The rights and the duties of the Standing Committee, except as provided in the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention, may be prescribed by the Canons of the respective Dioceses.ARTICLE V. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
I shall not consider here the amendments proposed to the canons. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:38 pm
In Canon USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:33 am
The source of all the confusion appears to be Article V of ECUSA's Constitution, which loosely states:A new Diocese may be formed, with the consent of the General Convention and under such conditions as the General Convention shall prescribe by General Canon or Canons, (1) by the division of an existing Diocese; (2) by the junction of two or more Dioceses or of parts of two or more Dioceses; or (3) by the erection into a Diocese of an unorganized area evangelized as… [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
In five sequential violations of Canon IV.9, Bishop Jefferts Schori (1) trumped up charges (which did not satisfy the Canon's requirements) against the Rt. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:09 pm
AUCC’s objection was filed by Glen Bloom, who acted for the law publishers in the CCH v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:36 pm
The previous posts are the Introduction, Part I,Part II, Part III, Part IV and Part V.] [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
The suit began in October of 2000, and ECUSA was named as a defendant.The next triennial budget was adopted at General Convention 2003, which saw the confirmation of the election of V. [read post]
