Search for: "Carey's, Inc. v. Carey" Results 101 - 120 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2012, 5:14 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/Ql6fIA (Jennifer Walrath) Legal Precedents Put Computer Assisted eDiscovery on Course to Broader Enterprise Acceptance –http://bit.ly/Qpvycr (Charles Skamser) Lyrics Website Fined $6.6m For Copyright Infringement - http://bit.ly/RwOLMu (@ITLexOrg) Mobile Messaging and Electronic Discovery: Part 2 of 4 - http://bit.ly/Ql0FpA (Daniel Garrie) No Fishing Expeditions Allowed When It Comes to Discovery of Social Media – eDiscovery Law… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:20 am
D’Onofrio (2005), 77 O.R. (3d) 583 (C.A.), which holds that novel causes of action are best determined on a fully developed record at trial rather than on a summary judgment motion, remains good law after Combined Air Mechanical Services Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:51 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Eli Lilly & Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1185 (05 September 2012) Carey -Morgan & Anor v Sloane Stanley Estate [2012] EWCA Civ 1181 (03 September 2012) French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP [2012] EWCA Civ 1180 (03 September 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McClaren v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [2012] EWHC 2466 (QB) (05 September 2012) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:01 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Yesterday, we looked at the cert. petition recently filed in Hoosier Racing Tire Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:04 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the defendants wrote on their website that there would be: “further evidence of a fraud investigation into Framptons, and not just into Mr Carey. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Carey, 2011 ONSC 7629, the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario interpreted Combined Air in Laikin v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
Earlier this year the Fifth Circuit issued an important decision on the issue of whether an arbitration agreement that a single party can retroactively modify or terminate is illusory and invalid in Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., 621 F.3d 1162, 1175-77 (9th Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In a legal malpractice decision (arising from a medical malpractice case) we see Justice Shulman of Supreme Court, New York County writing: "The doctrine of equitable estoppel may bar a defendant from asserting the statute of limitations when the plaintiff "was induced by fraud, misrepresentations or deception to refrain from filing a timely action" (Ross v Louise Wise Sews., Inc., 8 NY3d 478, 491 [2007], quoting Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442,… [read post]