Search for: "Caruso v. Caruso" Results 101 - 120 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2022, 5:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., LLC, 200 AD3d 816, 817; Yuxi Li v Caruso, 161 AD3d 1132, 1133). [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The claim should also be reinstated against Herrick Feinstein (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010] [finding that sound policy considerations support the tolling of the statute of limitations under the continuous representation doctrine while the representation of the same matter in which the malpractice is alleged is ongoing]). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "In opposition, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the Horn and Sager defendants committed malpractice by allegedly not calling the plaintiffs CPA as a witness, by advising him to enter into a modification of his March 12, 1999 child custody stipulation, or by failing to move to disqualify his former wife’s counsel (see generally Waggoner v Caruso, 14 NY3cl 874, 903 NYS2d 333 [2010]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 648 NYS2d 871 [1996]). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Caruso Issue: Whether a plaintiff in a 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court properly granted defendant Litchfield Cavo's motion to dismiss, since there was no evidence that Cavo, as superseding counsel, either contributed to the loss or could have done anything to correct the errors of predecessor counsel (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1 [2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]; Rivas v Raymond Schwartzberg & Assoc., PLLC, 52 AD3d 401 [2008]). [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1 51 Dept2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 8:27 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
An administrator is also obligated to act in the best interests of the estate, which includes carrying out the wishes of the decedent and acting in the best interest of the estate (Estate of Hudson By Caruso v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:12 am
City of New York, 182 A.D.2d 469, Matter of Caruso v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am by Ben
Courthouse News says "Underscoring the bizarre nature of the proceedings, no attorneys for Equustek Solutions or the Canadian court system showed up, allowing Caruso to state her case to U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:30 am by PaulKostro
Schwimmer, 12 N.J. 293, 301 (1953))); Caruso v. [read post]