Search for: "Caruso v. Caruso" Results 101 - 120 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 5:46 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On April 8, in the case of Bingham v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:24 pm by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270 [1993]; Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407 [2007]; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691 [2007]; Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648 [2007]; Kotzian v McCarthy, 36 AD3d 863 [2007]), while others hold that it must be "a" proximate cause of damages (Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793 [2007]; see e.g. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "In opposition, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the Horn and Sager defendants committed malpractice by allegedly not calling the plaintiffs CPA as a witness, by advising him to enter into a modification of his March 12, 1999 child custody stipulation, or by failing to move to disqualify his former wife’s counsel (see generally Waggoner v Caruso, 14 NY3cl 874, 903 NYS2d 333 [2010]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 648 NYS2d 871 [1996]). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We reject that contention inasmuch as the statute of limitations was tolled by the doctrine of continuous representation during the time that the same attorney represented plaintiffs in the underlying action (see [*2]Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 7, affd ___ NY3d ___ [May 11, 2010]; HNH Intl., Ltd. v Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP, 63 AD3d 534, 535)"   [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, contrary to the defendants' contention, the complaint "set forth allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant[s'] alleged malpractice might be reasonably inferred" (Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407, 410; see Fielding v Kupferman, 65 AD3d 437, 442). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:11 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Flying Dog CEO Jim Caruso haled the Commission's decision, but indicated no plans to drop the company's lawsuit, Flying Dog Brewery, LLLP v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:30 am by PaulKostro
Schwimmer, 12 N.J. 293, 301 (1953))); Caruso v. [read post]