Search for: "Case v. Colvin"
Results 101 - 120
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2016, 9:48 pm
WagesSharp v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:00 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., April 6, 2015) (affirming denial of social security benefits because plaintiff's testimony was contradictory and not credible) UnemploymentPreferred Hot Oil, LLC, v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:32 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., May 14, 2015) (affirming denial of disability and supplemental security income benefits)Discrimination Brown v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 9:35 pm
Colvin (10thCir., November 27, 2015) (affirming denial of disability benefits, Social Security Ruling 82-63’s presumption of disability in older claimants with limited education, work experience, and severe impairments)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 10:58 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., September 24, 2015) (reversing district court affirmation of the ALJ’s denial of social security benefits to Trujillo)Flowell Electric Association, Inc., v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 12:45 am
The case of Deborah Louise Biegalski v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 8:29 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., April 27, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits) [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:24 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation*Tilghman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:23 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., January 20, 2015) (affirming denial of supplemental security income) Contract/Noncompete/Trade Secret/Wrongful Termination Velez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 1:09 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., April 4, 2016) (reversing judgment in favor of Commissioner because the ALJ failed to properly evaluate consulting psychologist's opinion)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 8:15 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., December 10, 2015) (affirming denial of disability insurance benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:48 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., May 26, 2016) (reversing denial of disability benefits because the administrative law judge improperly ignored a relevant medical opinion without justification)Workplace Violence/Weapons*Kerkhoff v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:23 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., July 20, 2016) (affirming denial ofreview of ALJ determination that Ray was not impaired, as Ray failed to showany basis for reversal)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:11 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., August 10, 2016) (affirming denial of attorneys' fees, but reversing the district court's order dismissing Ridgell-Boltz's hostile-work-environment claim)*Chung v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 12:35 pm
Colvin, Acting Commissioner (10th Cir., October 30, 2014) (affirming denial of application for disability insurance benefits)Hutchins v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:51 am
Colvin (10th Cir., May 9, 2016) (affirming ALJ determination that Smith was not disabled)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 9:19 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., September 14, 2015) (affirming denial of Smith’s application for disability benefits and supplemental security income)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:45 am
Last week’s case of Jason Aaron Cook v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 9:51 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., July 7, 2015) (affirming denial of disability benefits)Discrimination/RetaliationJordan v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 3:58 am
What we know for sure is that in some cases, a person may suffer from a multitude of ailments that, individually, would not meet the high bar of proof necessary to show benefits should be awarded. [read post]
