Search for: "Case v. Hatch" Results 101 - 120 of 932
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 12:35 pm by Zarine Kharazian
On Thursday, January 11, Microsoft filed its brief in the U.S. v Microsoft case set to go before the Supreme Court in the 2017-2018 term. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:35 pm by Zarine Kharazian
On Thursday, January 11, Microsoft filed its brief in the U.S. v Microsoft case set to go before the Supreme Court in the 2017-2018 term. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
Batten down the hatches and standby for heavy seas. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm by Dru Stevenson
These cases came from the AG offices, not by public referendum in each petitioning state.Disclosure: I worked on this case during its nascent stage, very briefly, during my stint at the Connecticut Attorney General’s Office, so I have both a bias in favor of the majority’s holding, and a (limited) insider’s view on what goes on in the AG offices when these types of cases are hatching. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:04 am by Todd M. Nosher
Of particular interest will be whether the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) opts to file its own Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in connection with the Eleventh Circuit’s decision upholding a reverse payment in FTC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:31 am
In addition to the bottom-side briefs noted here, Senators Edward Kennedy, Orrin Hatch, and Dianne Feinstein have filed a "Brief in Support of Affirmance in Claiborne v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:35 pm
Some quotes:The Indiana Court of Appeals listened to arguments Tuesday in the case of Burke v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm
Along this line, compare Justice Scalia's discussion of text in the Hatch-Waxman Act in Merck v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 11:15 am by Todd M. Nosher
It now appears the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) will follow suit and file its own petition for Certiorari in FTC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 1:42 pm
In some cases, the user has independently invented the subject matter in question, in which case it would be inequitable to subject him or her to infringement liability. [read post]