Search for: "Cast v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
In the version of the article posted on SSRN, we stated categorically that the answer was No: Congress possesses no power to reject on substantive grounds votes actually cast by electors (as opposed to a power to determine the authenticity of the submitted votes; that is, whether the votes to be counted were actually the votes cast by the electors of the state). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
Moreover, the impact of the votes cast in each State is affected by the votes cast for the various candidates in other States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am
Here is the complaint: Carano v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Colorado isn’t even trying to prevent Colorado’s presidential electors from casting their electoral votes for Donald Trump if he wins the popular vote in Colorado in November, nor (as I’ve explained earlier) has it asserted any state law authority to exclude Trump from the Colorado general election ballot (something that Colorado law does not appear to authorize). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
State Parkway Condo. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
February 4, 2024 Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
If he did, all or almost all electors “pledged” to him would probably cast their votes for him in December, no matter what the Court has said about his eligibility. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm
In its 1988 opinion in Midler v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:49 pm
In Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. [read post]