Search for: "Century v. Fitness" Results 101 - 120 of 1,232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 4:47 am by Guest Author
  He explains why in this remarkable passage from his concurrence to Kisor v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:47 am by Guest Author
  He explains why in this remarkable passage from his concurrence to Kisor v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Laurence H. Tribe
There is little doubt that Dominion’s suit for damages met and indeed exceeded the standard the Supreme Court established in 1964 in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
It is an extraordinary power grab by the judicial branch, showing disrespect to two coequal branches: Congress, which saw it fit to authorize an expert agency to review these decisions; and the Executive Branch, which uses a U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:44 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
7001995 LINCOLN WEALTHACCELERATE 6999107 BARREL TROLLEY 6999106 BARREL BUS 7001871 GANOT 6995115 HAVEN 6996796 FLIPINOW 6996729 INFORMING YOUR AMBITION 6996686 EVE FEBRIS 6996685 IIL 6996643 DARE TO BE MAKERS OF POSSIBILITY 6998305 ELKHART COUNTY ROOFING 6996168 CATER TO YOU HOME CARE 6996167 AGENCY OF PREFERENCE 6995981 GS 6995810 ADD-A-MOTOR 6995725 M R MEDIATION ROUNDTABLE 6998272 THE FITNESS BOUTIQUE 6995048 HYPERSONIC GROUND TEST CENTER 6995044 AMERICAN ELEGANCE HOMES 6997987 SHINE… [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Notably, the key decisions pre-date Roe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:25 am by Unknown
At issue is a Ninth Circuit ruling that Slack argues upends a half-century of precedent holding that a plaintiff suing under Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act must prove that they bought registered shares. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 6:35 am by Marc DeGirolami
I have found that a good meme can do as much to make, say, Marbury v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This conference is part of the New Special Study of the Securities Markets (the “New Special Study”),[1] which is an ambitious effort to critically re-think how the securities markets should be regulated in the 21st century. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Relying pre-COVID pandemic on the judiciary’s dependably and excessively expansive application of the century-old Jacobson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
To say this will be keenly watched is an understatement: it may be the most significant trade mark decision in the UK this century. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Daniel Gilman
Given the Supreme Court’s recent articulation of the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
  And yet it is one in which the ideological positions of factions of both political camps might fit more comfortably than in the traditional "populism" which has now been demonized and marginalized. [read post]