Search for: "Certain v. Potter" Results 101 - 120 of 183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
We're going to discuss one of them, the earlier one, today: Deese v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:46 pm
  In California, the governing authority is Potter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
By 1961, his position had not changed, and he attempted to sway Justice Potter Stewart to his side while Baker v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
Johnson & Johnson [2010] EWCA Civ 1039 (IPKat) (EPLAW) Breaking news: Willy the Wizard v Harry Potter to go to full trial (IPKat) (1709 Blog) Rules for calculation of time periods measured in months (Patentology) Copyright Tribunal ‘small merger announced: not much change’ (1709 Blog) Costs: Amsterdam ‘nearer Newport’ than other parts of UK, rules IPO: Loadhog Ltd v Polymer Logistics BV (PatLit) The PCC page, no.1: ‘All change at the… [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That's inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of the one Supreme Court case that construes Section 4, Perry v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:30 am by Michelle Onibokun, Chuck Rosenberg
All three memos were issued early (March or April) in the election year, bore the same title (“Election Year Sensitivities”) and contained the same two sections in the same order: one that addressed the “Investigation and Prosecution of Election Crimes” and one that addressed the Hatch Act, a federal law prohibiting executive branch employees from engaging in partisan political activity under certain circumstances. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 1:56 pm
  I had never heard her name before President Ronald Reagan nominated her that summer to succeed Potter Stewart. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
  I had never heard her name before President Ronald Reagan nominated her that summer to succeed Potter Stewart. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Florian Mueller
But in connection with the merger doctrine (where there's only one way to express a certain function, function and expression merge), Google advocates a broad exclusion that goes beyond interoperability and includes anything functional. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
(As Hampton Dellinger explains, DOJ and President Lyndon Johnson were under considerable public pressure to make certain that Ali either served in the military or went to prison.) [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
In the end though, there isn’t enough data here to reach any conclusions about why certain Justices prefer certain methods. [read post]