Search for: "Certain v. Potter"
Results 101 - 120
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
We're going to discuss one of them, the earlier one, today: Deese v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 7:06 pm
In Potter v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:46 pm
In California, the governing authority is Potter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
By 1961, his position had not changed, and he attempted to sway Justice Potter Stewart to his side while Baker v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
Johnson & Johnson [2010] EWCA Civ 1039 (IPKat) (EPLAW) Breaking news: Willy the Wizard v Harry Potter to go to full trial (IPKat) (1709 Blog) Rules for calculation of time periods measured in months (Patentology) Copyright Tribunal ‘small merger announced: not much change’ (1709 Blog) Costs: Amsterdam ‘nearer Newport’ than other parts of UK, rules IPO: Loadhog Ltd v Polymer Logistics BV (PatLit) The PCC page, no.1: ‘All change at the… [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
And that calls up a certain [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm
See, e.g., Potter v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
That's inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of the one Supreme Court case that construes Section 4, Perry v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:30 am
All three memos were issued early (March or April) in the election year, bore the same title (“Election Year Sensitivities”) and contained the same two sections in the same order: one that addressed the “Investigation and Prosecution of Election Crimes” and one that addressed the Hatch Act, a federal law prohibiting executive branch employees from engaging in partisan political activity under certain circumstances. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 1:56 pm
I had never heard her name before President Ronald Reagan nominated her that summer to succeed Potter Stewart. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
I had never heard her name before President Ronald Reagan nominated her that summer to succeed Potter Stewart. [read post]
Oracle to appeals court: Google concedes away the entire case under established copyright principles
5 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
But in connection with the merger doctrine (where there's only one way to express a certain function, function and expression merge), Google advocates a broad exclusion that goes beyond interoperability and includes anything functional. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
(As Hampton Dellinger explains, DOJ and President Lyndon Johnson were under considerable public pressure to make certain that Ali either served in the military or went to prison.) [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
The 1877 Alabama case of Potter v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
In the end though, there isn’t enough data here to reach any conclusions about why certain Justices prefer certain methods. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]