Search for: "Certification of Question of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review"
Results 101 - 108
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
The law imposed a blanket ban on expending DOD funds to transfer Guantánamo detainees to the United States, and sharply restricted transfers to foreign countries. [read post]
19 May 2013, 8:00 am
Intelligence Community, relatively few officials have the truly deep knowledge and skills to properly perform a blue-sky review of our surveillance laws. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:32 pm
In other words, the FISA Court of Review recognized a foreign intelligence surveillance exception to the Warrant Clause that was novel in two critical regards: (1) in existing alongside and notwithstanding FISA; and (2) in applying even to those searches the primary purpose of which is not the gathering of foreign intelligence surveillance. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:13 am
And resolving the Fourth Amendment claim necessarily turns on the existence (vel non) of the foreign intelligence surveillance exception recognized by the FISA Court of Review in In re Directives. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Khuzami also announced the creation of an Office of Market Intelligence, which will be responsible for collecting, analyzing, evaluating, triaging, referring and monitoring the many tips, complaints and referrals received by the Division. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
See In re All Matters Submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 218 F. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:31 pm
Because the FISA Court of Review, in 2002, disagreed with the Fourth Circuit, and concluded (310 F.2d at 746) that the ordinary Fourth Amendment rules do not apply where the primary purpose of the surveillance or search, even if law-enforcement-related, is to obtain evidence of foreign intelligence crimes (rather than other sorts of crimes). [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 1:38 pm
And as Orin points out today, even in the unlikely even the FISA court rejects a certification, the program would remain in effect unless and until the Supreme Court affirms that FISA court decision. [read post]
