Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 101 - 120
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2015, 9:18 am
Lewry (Brooks Kushman PC) on Commil v Cisco and current US thinking on the necessary mind-set for being a secondary patent infringer [Annsley the AmeriKat discussed the same case here]. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Nonetheless, the Board found the connotations and commercial impressions of the marks to be "quite dissimilar" because of the presence of the word CREEK in applicant's mark.The circumstances of this case are very similar, if not identical, to those in Champagne Louis Roederer S.A. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Wang In April, we published an article about Fox Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:38 am
If you've been too busy watching for signs that spring has truly sprung, here's the summary of the IP news you missed last week:Trade MarksImage from RebaSpike via Pixabay.Marcel Pemsel discussed the recent General Court judgment in Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO - MHCS (Nuance de la couleur orange) (T-652/22) concerning the orange colour trade mark for the Veuve Clicquot champagne. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:10 pm
Brussels court in FN Herstal v Heckler & Koch wrestles with combination invention v mere aggregation of features. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 10:07 pm
" Comite Interprofessionel du Vin de Champagne v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:01 pm
But let us be one of the first to welcome the Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:12 am
Investigated for New Year’s champagne. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:43 am
Facebook v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
| The champagne of trade mark disputes | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
As noted by Judge Wardlaw in her concurring opinion, Costco sells “a wide range of luxury goods, including Dom Pérignon Champagne, Waterford crystal, Dolce & Gabbana handbags”(p. 9). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Shack and Jacques v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:22 am
” A Panel can do this under Rule 12, that is request statements from the complainant as the Panel did, for example, in Comité Interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
I The champagne of trade mark disputes I Jaguar Land Rover DEFEND[ER]s its trade mark I Länsförsäkringar, Länsförsäkringar, bork, bork, bork! [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
With this Kat’s feed being flooded with the news of the ruling in “Pecorino Romano” v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Drinking while sitting at 2:21 He ordered champagne at the hotel (2:38) with Miss Manken but he walked in. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:52 am
If the defendant had simply intentionally murdered someone, they would only be required to comply with these postrelease conditions for 36 months.The proportionality argument is that this lifetime postrelease sentence is unconstitutional under the three factors set forth in State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Analysis In summary then, champagne corks in New York, tears in Argentina, and a good outing for Jonathan Sumption before his soon-to-be colleagues. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:52 am
Seuss Enters. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 1:32 am
| The champagne of trade mark disputes | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
