Search for: "Childs v. Johnson" Results 101 - 120 of 1,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 11 July 2022 Johnson J heard the trial of preliminary issues in the case of Nagi v Santhiramoulesan. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 12:12 am by Frank Cranmer
Elvira Loibl, Strasbourg Observers: Abdi Ibrahim v Norway: A new Zeitgeist regarding (intercultural) adoptions at the ECtHR: on the decision by the Norwegian authorities to allow the adoption of a child by a ‘Norwegian Christian’ foster family against the wishes of his mother, a Muslim Somali refugee. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 4:33 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
: Gender and Child Protection in UN Peacekeeping Philipp Neubauer, Cornelius Friesendorf & Ursula C. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
To take one random example, see Johnson v Unisys [2013] 1 AC 518, in which the House of Lords held that it was not permissible to bring a common law claim for breach of contract which would sidestep the restrictions on the statutory unfair dismissal regime. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project has published a summary of Re B, R & G (a Child) [2022] EWHC 320 (Fam), in which the local authority was applying for reporting restrictions for the trial of G and E’s parents, who were charged with the murder of E. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Johnson outlined that individuals who test positive would be advised to remain home, but that a legal requirement to quarantine or self-isolate ended on February 24th. [read post]