Search for: "Childs v. State of California (1983)"
Results 101 - 120
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
Medical Devices (Discovery): PAIN PATCH MAKER MUST REVEAL DATA IN CALIFORNIA DEATH SUIT, Standing v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
[but] in a general sense, the principles of comment k relate to the negligence concepts.Toner, 732 P.2d at 310-11 (various citations omitted).Toner relied heavily on then-California law, as decided by intermediate California courts, especially Kearl v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Hosps. (1983) 141 CA3d 891, 897, 190 CR 649, 653; also see Burgess v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:28 pm
§ 1983. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Failure to Warn: CALIFORNIA APPEALS COURT BACKS DISMISSAL OF SURGICAL TOOL INJURY SUIT, Courtenay v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:24 pm
The Bird court forged a lot of new territory in the world of tort law, creating some tort-reform "poster child" cases such as Bigbee v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
§ 23.11 Loss of Consortium Claim for the Death of a Child The Case: Hancock v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Siers: Reasoning that, under State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
The case involved Los Angeles County’s enforcement of the California Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:57 pm
Two Northern California Judges recently ruled in education cases: Doe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 8:03 am
Under state statute, their names were added to a child abuse database for a period of 10 years. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:05 pm
Now, the state reviews only cases before 1983. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:29 am
Among the 707 cases, only six prosecutors — 0.8% — were disciplined by the State Bar of California. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Mason, 527 F.3d 252, 255 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Concepcion (Federal Arbitration Act preemption of California rule that a waiver of class arbitration in a consumer contract may be unenforceable) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
§ 1983. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
§ 1983. [read post]
