Search for: "Christopher v. State Bar"
Results 101 - 120
of 634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2007, 6:45 am
Corporate advocates warned that proxy access would be disruptive and called on the SEC to bar access proposals. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(2) bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings previously initiated against the person sought for that offense. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:06 pm
AndreIn Salas v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Feb. 7, 2019, pet. filed) (mem. op. by Tracy Christopher). [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:33 am
It is important to establish and enforce a strong, state-of-the-art anti-harassment policy. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:37 am
One of the three appellate judges on the panel, Justice Tracy Christopher, dissented. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm
Kappos, Mayo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
A notice of the lawsuit, Francis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:34 pm
In Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 2:41 pm
Kobylarz discusses Mark Lemley's change in position on obviousness in KSR v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
by Christopher Sagers The next Term may see significant SCOTUS consideration of the state action immunity, the first such case since 1992. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 12:01 pm
Christopher J. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:27 pm
See Sackett v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 2:13 pm
By Christopher M. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:14 am
By Christopher M. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
(See also the celebrated United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
(See also the celebrated United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
