Search for: "City and County of San Francisco v. Post" Results 101 - 120 of 477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2007, 3:28 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 125 S.Ct. 2491 (2005). [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:36 pm
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005) four Justices noted the ripeness rules of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), this Court held that state court judgments in actions filed pursuant to Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:40 am
The Supreme Court just issued its opinion in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:39 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 196 F.R.D. 362, 366 (N.D.Cal. 2000) (same). [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
The justices’ lone grant of review came in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
County of San Bernardino (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 352. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), four Justices agreed Williamson County produces absurd results and denies federal court review of federal constitutional rights. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm by Nathan Sheard
Since 2019, when San Francisco became the first city to adopt such a ban, more than a dozen communities across the country have followed San Francisco's lead. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  San Francisco Deputy City Attorney Owen Clements presented the public entities' position. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am by Susan Brenner
  Moylan and Raskin sued the City and County of San Francisco, Janice Madsen, Kym Dougherty, Audrey Hillman, Heather Grives and “Does 1-10”. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]