Search for: "City of Ontario v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm
” – Nakatsuru J. in Morris, at para. 1 R v Morris is a sentencing decision delivered in the Ontario Superior Court by Justice S. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:51 am
” The Decision Of The Superior Court Of Justice After the arbitrator’s award, the numbered company (referred to in the judgments as Brookfield) appealed the award to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:01 am
C.A.), Ontario Hydro v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Then, she simultaneously appealed the decision before the Divisional Court of Ontario, and applied for judicial review. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Another way to categorize is to emphasize proceedings commonly heard in the Provincial Court instead of the Superior Court of Justice.[6] Naturally, there is considerable overlap in the concepts identified below to all levels of court but it is the purpose of this paper to illustrate how the most common forms of wrongful convictions and the reasons thereof are crystallised most at levels short of high-profile offences. 2. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Another way to categorize is to emphasize proceedings commonly heard in the Provincial Court instead of the Superior Court of Justice.[6] Naturally, there is considerable overlap in the concepts identified below to all levels of court but it is the purpose of this paper to illustrate how the most common forms of wrongful convictions and the reasons thereof are crystallised most at levels short of high-profile offences. 2. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am
0, that such an enhancement is possible, but only in “rare” or “exceptional” circumstances involving superior performance, superior results, or unusual delay. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
Pursuant to a Court Order dated February 5, 2009, t [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:11 am
Ontario (“Working Families II”), both decisions of Morgan J. in the Superior Court, and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:19 am
This group, spearheaded by Zexi Li, filed a statement of claim for a potential class-action lawsuit on Friday February 4th at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:33 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that it was not reasonable for the parties to assume or expect that the business sold by Steele would expand into all of Ontario, into all provinces of the country and into the United States of America. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:09 pm
No. 1236, March 23, 2011, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, M.J. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:06 am
The case of two numbered companies, 1000425140 Ontario Inc. v. 1000176653 Ontario Inc., 2023 ONSC 6688, was actually a lawsuit brought by Canadian basketball player and Oklahoma City Thunder Point Guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander to set aside his purchase of a home in Burlington, Ontario. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm
[emphasis added] The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released a decision in Austin v Bell Canada, involving a class action around an annual indexing provision of a pension plan, which did largely center around a single comma. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 11:36 am
In that vein, a recent procedural decision from the Ontario Superior Court demonstrates how creative counsel can act to shield vulnerable parties from preventable harm during the litigation process. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:50 am
Hamilton (City), the Ontario Superior Court has recently answered Yes to these questions. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Paul Perell – now a judge of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – commented on the tension inherent in the reasoning in Housen: Both the majority and the minority in the Supreme Court purported to apply the established case law about appellate review and each side robustly accused the other of not understanding or properly applying the law. [read post]
