Search for: "Clarence T."
Results 101 - 120
of 3,715
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
I can't imagine the liberals objected. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Ferguson, is noteworthy because of dissents from the denial of cert by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
At one point during the argument she thought, “Fuck you, Justice Scalia,” (143) and hoped she hadn’t said it out loud. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:32 am
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito both penned dissents from the court’s denial of review. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm
” Justice Clarence Thomas asked whether Congress could tax an increase in the value of real estate, while Justice Neil Gorsuch asked about the possibility of a tax on retirement investment accounts, which millions of Americans hold. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:58 am
Which it acknowledges wasn't illegal. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Can’t read German? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm
Is there any reason, he asked Gannon, why the federal government didn’t rely on that doctrine? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
” Sandra countered that she “didn’t expect a flat,” but he retorted that she should “expect anything out here. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of certiorari, arguing that it “seems illogical and unfair” to relax the common-law requirement that collateral estoppel bind litigants in later litigation only when both parties are the same. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
[T]hat’s the issue. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch – two votes shy of the threshold needed for emergency relief – indicated that they would have granted the parents’ request. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:00 pm
” Unsurprisingly, the Code did not appease critics who have raised questions about recent revelations of Justice Clarence Thomas’s acceptance of extravagant largesse as well as other Justices’ questionable conduct.And for good reason. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” Accordingly, “[t]he Court orders the Secretary of State to place Donald J. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:35 pm
Fifth Circuit: You shouldn't! [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
” And online at The New Yorker, Andy Borowitz’s “The Borowitz Report” has a post titled “Clarence Thomas Collapses from Exhaustion After First Full Day of Regulating Himself. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:57 am
” I guess it’s good when academics like it and bad when they don’t. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:26 pm
But that doesn't prove ethics concerns are completely without merit. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 6:36 pm
” In commentary, Tuesday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal will contain an editorial titled “The Supreme Court’s New Ethics Code: The substance is fine, but the partisan critics won’t be appeased. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 4:14 am
But this isn’t just some random idiot, but a congresswoman. [read post]
