Search for: "Clark v. Burden" Results 101 - 120 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2018, 8:14 am by JEMIMA LOVATT
Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge were in agreement and allowed the appeal. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by MOTP
Clark, for Warren Gattenby, Appellant.On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:50 pm by Larry
This comes from a 1984 Court of Appeals decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am by Neil Wilkof
The three-part test for breach of confidence set out in the English case of "Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd" [1969] RPC 41 is well known to common-law practitioners. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 8:15 am by Matthew Brady
Sources: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/regulations/hazardous-materials https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/893/v/54 The post Understanding the Extreme Dangers of Hazmat Truck Accidents  appeared first on Herrling Clark Law Firm. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am by DR PAUL DALY, QUEENS' COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]