Search for: "Clark v. Burden"
Results 101 - 120
of 684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2021, 4:01 am
It should not be construed as an additional burden on rights claimants that has to be satisfied in every case. [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:05 am
In Clark v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:00 pm
Clark, a Section 1983 unreasonable seizure case. [read post]
9 May 2021, 8:40 am
Clarke v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Table 1: Selected County and Municipal Rental Car Excise Taxes State Locality Car Rental Excise Tax Funding Purpose Alaska Anchorage 8% City general fund Arizona Maricopa County (Phoenix) The greater of 3.25% or $2.50 per rental Glendale Stadium; youth & amateur sports Arizona Pima County (Tucson) $3.50 Kino Sports Complex Colorado Denver 7.25% Colorado Convention Center Georgia Atlanta 10% State Farm Arena Illinois Chicago 6% and 9% transaction tax (a) City general fund Indiana Marion… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:37 pm
Issue: the standard of proof in s.9 applications In Wright v Ver [2020] 1 WLR 3913, Dingemans LJ held (obiter) that the standard of proof in s.9 applications is the ‘balance of probabilities’. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am
The regulation does need to assiduously avoid “content preference,” Clark v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am
The regulation does need to assiduously avoid “content preference,” Clark v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
” Clark v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 12:00 am
See Brown v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
In Colgrove v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
In a case pending at the Supreme Court, Fulton v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
Gantner v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Barr v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
The case of Murray v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am
In other words, the burden of proof of misuse or likelihood of misuse now falls on the defendant. [read post]
