Search for: "Clark v. Judge" Results 101 - 120 of 2,304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The ABC has reversed a decision to drop its public interest defence of a defamation suit brought by former commando Heston Russell, during a day of legal argument labelled “farcical” by a federal court judge. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
Our own conclusions based upon the publicly available information are bolstered by the analysis of many other authorities: A federal judge has already found by a preponderance of the evidence that Trump and a co-conspirator (John Eastman) likely violated 18 U.S.C. [read post]
In determining whether a substantial part was taken, the judge quoted HHJ Clarke in ATB Sales[2], stating that, “what matters is the extent to which that part contains elements which express the intellectual creation of the author. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In its review of his case, that court simply ignored the factors that Flowers had required judges to use when a defendant brings a Batson challenge.Justice Sotomayor points out that the “Mississippi Supreme Court was not just wrong, but wrong in the very same way it had been wrong just a few years ago. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented from the denial of rehearing en banc, in an opinion joined by three other judges. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
A Sydney judge has thrown out a defamation case brought by a man against a former partner over a Facebook post accusing him of stalking and harassment. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
Judge Marvin Quattlebaum concurred in part and dissented in part. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:18 pm by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
On May 19, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its split opinion in Clark, et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:53 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
But the tides are changing, as evidenced most recently by the Sixth Circuit’s May 19, 2023 decision in Clark v. [read post]