Search for: "Clark v. Woods" Results 101 - 120 of 172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda… [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Anne Shale
Tracy and Randy Wood: Paternal grandparents of CC. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Yours faithfully Solicitors David Jockelson Miles and Partners Kate Hammond Miles and partners Sarah Cove Miles and Partners Amanda Dench Miles and Partners Pauline Lloyd Ewings & Co Peggy Ray Goodman Ray Gwen Williams Goodman Ray Hilka Hollmann Goodman Ray Joanna Bosanquet  Goodman Ray Michael Bourdages Goodman Ray Christina Blacklaws  TV Edwards David Emmerson T V Edwards Lorraine Green TV Edwards Susan Fitzgerald TV Edwards Valerie Greenfield  Fisher Meredith LLP… [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
  A split of this kind is highly unusual – the most recent example that we are aware of is the case of Sheldrake v DPP [2003] EWHC 273 (Admin) in October 2002 where Latham LJ and McCombe J were unable to agree and directed a hearing before a three judge court which took place 4 months later before Clarke LJ and Henriques and Jack JJ who reached a 2:1 decision (which was itself subsequently overturned by the House of Lords). [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Clark, which I discussed here, involved the application of Crawford v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Other resolved complaints listed: Mr Giovanni Di Stefano v Sunday Mail (Clauses 1, 2), 04/05/2012; Mr Michael Speck v The Sunday Times (Clauses 1, 2), 04/05/2012; Peter Reynolds v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012); Jean-Pierre Bestel v Gravesend Reporter (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; A man v Sunday Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Croydon Council v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1),… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
He did not work for NME and was never discarded by the IPC as a possible editor for the magazine.” Jeremy Clarke-Williams, Russell Jones Walker, acted for the claimant. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
Nolan to Go Out On Limb In Kleen Products Predictive Coding Case - bit.ly/HGgMfD (Matthew Nelson) Proportionality Demystified: How Organizations Can Get eDiscovery Right by Following Four Key Principles – http://bit.ly/IUFds3 (Philip Favro) Redefine Transparency in Predictive Coding: Shoot for Validity - bit.ly/HL7PhL (Gerard Britton) Robinson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Professor Lorna Woods raises the question of whether Sky is a “fit and proper person” to hold a broadcasting licence, on the City Legal Research blog. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post-Grant) AUTM survey shows significant increases in university patent filings and issuances in FY2010 (Patent Docs) Pending Supreme Court and en banc Federal Circuit patent cases (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions Shift in grounds of USPTO reexamination rejection examined by CAFC: In re Stepan Company (Patents Post-Grant) (IPBiz) CAFC tackles “consisting of” in In re Taylor (IPBiz) Federal Circuit affirms limits on using litigation expenses to meet domestic… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
Modi v Clarke, heard 22 June 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Thomas and Moses LJJ). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:25 am by Kashmir Hill
Sadly, though, there are no dwarfs or donkeys in these pages.Clark v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am by Nabiha Syed
Tinklenberg, in which the Court interpreted the Speedy Trial Act Writing for this blog, Jennifer Clark summarized the opinion in Camreta v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 6:40 am by Howard Friedman
He claimed in part that the restriction was imposed because he is a practitioner of Buddhism.In Clark v. [read post]