Search for: "Cliff v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2013, 10:34 am
Chiplin and Lilly begin their article with an extensive review of the historical debate concerning public health insurance in the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:31 am
And according to this article in the New York Times, Professor Golb’s views attracted limited support from other scholars, and none from any major academics in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 8:50 am
UNITED STATES. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
UNITED STATES. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 6:46 am
Eaton v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm
It is this dreadful feature of our political system, NOT required by the Constitution, that explains why it now counts as "success" if the United States doesn't go over a "cliff" or continues to pay its debts, as against genuinely confronting the serious problems that face us as a polity. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
But see contra United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:56 pm
By Amy Clarise AshworthEvans Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:31 pm
Drug Compounding and Competition: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in K-V Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
” DHS & DOJ – Asylum Grants & Revocations: A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had no authority to terminate the asylum status of petitioner in Nijjar v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
” DHS & DOJ – Asylum Grants & Revocations: A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had no authority to terminate the asylum status of petitioner in Nijjar v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
United States where a majority of the Supreme Court ruled Arizona's controversial Immigration law a\k\a SB1070 as unconstitutional. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:30 am
Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:35 pm
United States Steel Corporation [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:50 am
Cliff, 419 N.J. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
His recent attempt to register “Eat More Kale” with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), however, irked Georgia-based Chick-fil-A, which sent him a cease-and-desist letter claiming the marks are confusingly similar, according to press accounts. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
"And even if the Supreme Court is fixated on Citizens United, a united citizenry might decide to focus on the actual words of the Constitution themselves.The Guarantee Clause says that the United States shall guarantee to the states a republican form of government. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Much of the news coverage of the Court focuses on yesterday’s grants: In United States v. [read post]
