Search for: "Close v. People"
Results 101 - 120
of 12,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
There are lots of people who would be guilty of murder if it's enough that they don't care that someone's "hurt" who definitely wouldn't be guilty of murder if the required showing is that they have to not care that someone may be killed by their actions sufficient to demonstrate a "conscious disregard for human life. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:27 pm
In 1964, in Reynolds v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:20 am
First to present closing arguments was Mr. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm
During trial and closing argument, the prosecutor introduced a picture of both the defendant and the victim. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 2:02 pm
Close neighbors. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
(People v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:16 am
A sense that's only highlighted by the fact that this case is entitled People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:29 am
Kraft and State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:07 am
Hall v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 1:23 pm
A divided court issued its decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am
It all seems so sanitary from a distance, but it’s a royal mess up close. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:00 pm
See Beclar Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:37 am
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Burden shifting Anthony Bowers, appellant, was charged in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City in connection with a shooting outside a bar on December 11, 2016, which injured five people. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:09 pm
([C]ompare People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:17 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
Dukes , are extremely unfair to people who have been injured. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
The post Public Citizen v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:48 pm
” The prosecutor at Bradford's shoplifting trial said during closing argument: “You got wire cutters. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:15 pm
risk of a false confession, then I can see why you'd let this stuff go on.Ultimately, here, the Court of Appeal holds that the present facts are pretty darn close to a prior case that held that the interrogation was custodial, so it was ineffective assistance of counsel not to try to exclude the confession (since there were no Miranda warnings). [read post]
